WTTM WIYN's role in completing WTTM - more active. Assumed responsibility for getting manual obtaining filters (has purchased Sloan set, Johnson) scientific commissioning roles (Kent, Chuck, Abi). procure science grade CCD - remains NOAO's responsibility Dave S has been working on monsoon controllers, and we may be able to run new detector over the summer. WIYN had agreed to support project at 1.1 FTE level - this has been continuing to an additional year Priorities indicated as H, M, L 1. produce observing manual -- Pat, Charles, Chuck (in progress) 2. DIQ improvement estimates at various filters -- WTTM with and w/out correction (BVRIZ, but they are only doing B, I) -- compare with mini-mo as baseline (static vs. static) -- also effective throughput -- dependence with guide star mag/correction speed, distance from guide, mean seeing evaluation in B and I -- PSF variation across field 3. distortion map (March T&E) -- must be in header 4. wavelength response characterization w/ each dichroic -- we have beamsplitters in hand; Chuck signed off on backside AR coating -- frontside coatings supposed to be delivered on 15th -- don't have vendor for R beamsplitter -- ordered 2 8515 beamsplitters 5. CCD response properties: linearity, fat-zero, noise-isolation, cross-talk (part is March T&E) 6. shutter characterization: timing correction and shanding correction 7. image and optical alignment of both IAS mount and pickoff-mirror 8. scattered light measurements 1. verify accuracy and completeness of header info (to within limits Charles has) -- does ccdproc work 1. does focus tracking work? focus error sensor reading as a function of telescope out of focus -- want to show that the error sensor is capable of responding to defocus in all the filters. 2. does instrument 'talk' correctly to WIYN control system? done 3. DADS connection - done 1. focus offset with respect to minimo -- not planned for this T&E 2. do flat fields work even after switching 1. Interface to observer will streamline command structure at this T&E observer has a primer on what all this telemetry means have Kent write a summary of what improvements needs to be made need functional interface plus primer 1. photometry demonstration 1. throughput 50% with the 95/5 observers need to know if there is a chance that they'll want to use WTTM to put that in the ORP. tabled discussion of whether just to accept WTTM with the caveat that NOAO still has to deliver red-sensitive camera vs not accepting until camera is delivered tabled discussion to boost WTTM scientific productivity what flexibility do we require in scheduling Eric On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Abhijit Saha wrote: > Hey Eric, > > The WTTM commissioning actions list..... > > Please, please, pleeeaaase ?? > > Cheers > Abi > -- _____________________________________________________________________________ Eric M. Wilcots Associate Professor Department of Astronomy University of Wisconsin - Madison Madison, WI 53706 phone: 608-262-2364 --=-S5hU0B1x5dOOlB94pJTZ--